McDonald’s Brit boss Steve Easterbrook has ‘been a naughty boy’ brother-in-law says after his sacking for work – The Sun

THE brother-in-law of the Brit McDonald’s boss sacked for having a fling with an employee has said “he’s been a naughty boy”.

The fast food giant said chief executive Steve Easterbrook, 52, who was paid £12 million last year, had demonstrated poor judgement.

 McDonald's CEO Steve Easterbrook has been sacked after having a relationship with an employee


McDonald’s CEO Steve Easterbrook has been sacked after having a relationship with an employeeCredit: McDonald’s

McDonald’s forbids bosses from having consensual romantic relationships with subordinates, regardless of whether they directly manage them.

Watford-born Easterbrook is divorced from ex-wife Susie and has three children.

His brother-in-law Mark Baxter, 55, told the MailOnline: “Looks like Steve has been a naughty boy.

“We heard on Sunday that he had been fired. We don’t know any other details. My wife keeps in contact but we have not seen him for a while.”

Mr Baxter is married to Easterbrook’s sister Joanne and owns a 400-acre farm near Berkhamsted in Hertfordshire.

He said the former McDonald’s boss divorced in 2015, around the time he moved to America to become the company’s CEO

In an email to employees, Easterbrook acknowledged he had a relationship with an employee and said it was a mistake.

“Given the values of the company, I agree with the board that it is time for me to move on,” he said.

 The McDonald's boss split from his wife Susie. pictured, in 2015


The McDonald’s boss split from his wife Susie. pictured, in 2015Credit: Facebook
 Easterbrook at a McDonald's launch event in New York with model Chrissy Teigen in 2017


Easterbrook at a McDonald’s launch event in New York with model Chrissy Teigen in 2017Credit: Getty Images – Getty
 The chief even donned an apron behind the counter for the event


The chief even donned an apron behind the counter for the eventCredit: Getty Images – Getty

Easterbrook joined McDonald’s in 1993 as a manager in London and worked his way up through the ranks of the company.

He left to become the boss of Pizza Express in 2011 and then Wagamama before returning to McDonald’s in 2013 after which he became the global boss of the company.

Scrutiny of executives and their treatment of employees has intensified amid the #MeToo movement, which highlighted sexual harassment in the workplace and abuse of power by male executives.

In June 2018, Intel boss Brian Krzanich resigned after he had a consensual relationship with an employee that breached company policy.

According to Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond, Easterbrook’s sacking is sign of the influence of MeToo#.

“Other companies don’t always act on that kind of information or fire their CEO for that, and so it seems like they trying to enforce a pretty strict policy in this situation,” he said.

 McDonald's board of directors voted on Easterbrook's departure Friday after conducting a thorough review.


McDonald’s board of directors voted on Easterbrook’s departure Friday after conducting a thorough review.Credit: Getty Images – Getty

McDonald’s has itself faced sexual harassment charges and in May said it was enhancing training and offering a new hotline, after workers filed dozens of complaints against the company.

Fight for $15, the group which filed the charges, said McDonald’s response to its sexual harassment complaints has been inadequate, and “the company needs to be completely transparent about Easterbrook’s firing and any other executive departures related to these issues”.

McDonald’s board of directors decided on Easterbrook’s departure on Friday and details of his severance package will be released today.

Under his leadership the company’s shares nearly doubled in value while sales at its US restaurants stagnated.

He was responsible for expanding delivery and mobile payments as well as bringing in digital ordering kiosks.

The board of directors named Chris Kempczinski, who joined the company in 2015 and recently served as president of McDonald’s USA, as the new CEO.



PlayStation 5 price leak suggests Sonys 2020 console will be affordable – Mirror Online

There’s still more than a year to go before Sony finally unveils its PlayStation 5 console, but despite this timeline, rumours are already flying left, right and centre about the device.

The latest rumour from Pushsquare gives us a hint about the PlayStation 5’s price, and indicates that it may not be as expensive as previously expected.

Pushsquare points to a recent Sony financial briefing, in which the tech giant claimed that it’s focusing on ‘market penetration and market acceptability’ with the PS5.

While this doesn’t exactly say much about the price, Pushsquare claims that Sony ‘wants to set a price that consumers will accept.’

Is this the PlayStation 5?
(Image: Playstation)


It explained: “This is going to prove a balancing act: the system sounds like an absolute beast with very little compromise on specifications, so it’s not going to be cheap.

“Affordable, though – that appears to be the aim.”

The rumour comes shortly after Sony finally confirmed the name and launch date for its next generation console.

Video Loading

Video Unavailable

Read More

PlayStation 5 rumours

As expected, the console is called the PlayStation 5 , and will launch in time for ‘Holiday 2020.’

In a blog about the news, Jim Ryan , President and CEO of SIE, said: “Since we originally unveiled our next-generation console in April, we know that there’s been a lot of excitement and interest in hearing more about what the future of games will bring.

“Today I’m proud to share that our next-generation console will be called PlayStation 5, and we’ll be launching in time for Holiday 2020.”

Apple rejecting Electron apps from Mac App Store due to private API usage – 9to5Mac

On iOS, all apps must go through the App Store. On macOS, the Mac App Store is just one method of distribution and developers are free to publish their apps independently on their own website. This means app rejection policies on macOS are not as painful as with iPhone or iPad, but they are nevertheless significant.

Developers are reporting that apps made using Electron (which is a framework that allows companies to ship web apps in a native app wrapper) are now being rejected by the automated Mac App Store review process.

Try Amazon Prime 30-Day Free Trial

The apps in question are getting flagged because of their usage of private API calls. These API calls are not in the app itself, but part of the underlying Electron framework.

The detected private API symbols include:


Apparently, the Electron framework has used these APIs for years. What has happened is that Apple has upgraded its server-side app review processes to detect more violations of its App Review guidelines, and now this private API usage is being identified.

Individual Electron app makers are a bit helpless as the issue can only really be fixed by pushing changes in the Electron code itself. It does not appear that Electron is doing anything extreme, certainly nothing malicious. App Review doesn’t care about why an app is using private API, it’s a hard and fast rule (at least in theory).

At a surface level, it seems like it should be relatively straightforward for Electron to remove the API references and use alternative approaches. It’s just that the work hasn’t been done yet which means people depending on Electron are currently in a bind.

The rise in Electron rejections is being interpreted by some as a crackdown against Electron in the wake of the introduction of Apple’s Catalyst framework, which helps developers quickly port native iPad apps to the Mac. It’s a nice conspiracy theory but it doesn’t really make sense. Apple doesn’t really have an incentive, financial or otherwise, to force developers to use Catalyst.

If Mac developers do not want to submit their apps to the App Store, they can publish apps independently. However, as of macOS Catalina, apps must still be notarized using a registered developer account so that they can appease the Gatekeeper security model and are allowed to run on customer’s machines.

Notarization is mostly about making a digital signature of the app so that it cannot be tampered with and can be identified by the system later. It is not a mini app review process so it doesn’t check for things like private API usage.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Spigen iPhone 11 case

Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news:

Android users warned to delete app that secretly buys premium content –

Android users have been warned to delete this app (Getty)
Android users have been warned to delete this app (Getty)

Security researchers have uncovered a malicious app that secretly signs users up for premium content without their knowledge.

The app has been downloaded tens of millions of times by Android users, despite being removed from the Google Play Store back in June 2019.

It’s called ‘a.i type’ and is a keyboard app that lets you customise the on-screen keyboard of Android phones like those made by Samsung, Motorola or Huawei.

However, in the background it is signing up – and paying for – various premium services that the user may not even be aware of. That’s the message from Secure-D, a team of security specialists from Upstream Systems. They found a huge amount of suspicious mobile transactions and traced it back to the app.

‘Ai.type’s popularity and useful features have been used to disguise systematic and worrying activity,’ the team explained in a comprehensive report.

‘This happens in the background without the user being aware and includes fake ad views and attempted digital purchases. While the activity is partly targeted at advertisers, it affects users in the following ways:

‘Subscribes users to premium services depleting their mobile data and adding charges that eat into their pre-paid airtime. In many emerging markets, using pre-paid airtime is the only way to pay for digital services.

Women using a smartphone in the display and technology advances in stores. Take your screen to put on advertising.
The malicious app ran processes in the background (Getty Images/iStockphoto)

‘Reduces battery life, even when the device is not in use, due to the unseen background activity. May overheat the device and affect its overall performance.’

Naturally, the advice is to delete this app if you’ve got it installed on your phone. But the team concluded it was part of a larger problem of mobile ad fraud run through freely available apps.

‘To avoid falling victim to data theft and unwanted purchases or subscriptions, Android users should immediately check their phones to see if they have any suspicious app installed,’ the authors wrote.

‘In most cases, Google Play is a safer source of Android apps – but even apps from legitimate sources can be compromised. Before any installation, users should check the app’s reviews, developer details, and list of requested permissions, making sure that they all relate to the app’s stated purpose.’

Watch out, the Pokémon Sword and Shield leaks are everywhere –

With just over a week left until Pokmon Sword and Shield’s release, all sorts of juicy Pokmon information is now leaking like a Sobble across the internet.

We won’t discuss the latest – and very extensive – leaks in detail, but if you do want to see them for some reason the information is easy enough to find – such as in this ResetEra thread which details everything found so far. (It’s worth noting there are no immediate spoilers when you click on that link, and each leak is separated into sections – so if you want to see the new Galarian forms but not the full list of Gen 8 Pokmon, you’re safe.)

And if you don’t want to see anything, it’s worth clicking away now and shutting off your internet for another week.

Interestingly, this latest information only serves as further confirmation of the notable Pokmon Sword and Shield leak from earlier this year. The ‘Affleck Leak’ (named for the image of Ben Affleck posted alongside it) actually dates back to May, where an anonymous 4chan user posted a bunch of information that, at first, seemed a little Farfetch’d.

However, with each new trailer it’s become apparent the Affleck leak was indeed accurate – the reveal of Team Yell, for example – and now the latest leaks are corroborating it further.

Below is a screenshot of the original 4chan post – which includes details which have now been confirmed as well as some information yet to be officially announced, so scroll down at your own risk (there’s only text here though, no leaked images of new Pokmon, promise).

We’re not providing a link to this post as it initially tried to redirect us to the darknet. The Pokmon leaks go deep, apparently.

Pokmon Sword and Shield releases for Nintendo Switch on the 15th November, but these are the only leeks I personally want to see until then.

Faze Clan’s Jarvis gets Fortnite permaban for using aimbots –

FaZe Clan member Jarvis Kaye
Will Jarvis be banned for good?

Epic Games has given Jarvis from FaZe Clan a lifetime ban on Fortnite, after he posted videos showing how to cheat in Battle Royale.

YouTuber and FaZe Clan member Jarvis Kaye has apologised to his 2 million subscribers for using aimbots in Fortnite Battle Royale, after he revealed he’s earned a permeant ban from Epic Games.

Rather than cheating during a competitive match he uploaded videos showing him using aimbots (which fire automatically at opponents) in both solos and playground modes.

Kaye argues that he only made the videos as entertainment and never had any intention of using aimbots competitively.

Using aimbots, or hacking Fortnite in anyway, is expressly forbidden by Epic Game’s terms & conditions, but some have argued that Kaye’s punishment has been unfairly harsh.

Many fans have started using the hashtag #FreeJarvis, pointing out that many people have done the same thing and only earned a ban of a couple of weeks.

Xxif and Ronaldo were both caught cheating in the Fortnite World Cup qualifiers and yet were only banned for two weeks, and were still allows to compete in the rest of the World Cup.

The counter-argument is that Epic Games has actually sued YouTubers before, for promoting hacking software, which is essentially what Kaye was doing it, and that rather than a one-off offense his videos could’ve encouraged many others to cheat as well.

Whether their decision will remain final is unclear though and fans are hoping that they’ll allow Kaye back, following his apology.

Email, leave a comment below, and follow us on Twitter

MORE: FaZe Clan claims Fortnite star Tfue is secretly planning to launch competitor following lawsuit

MORE: 13 year old Fortnite streamer breaks a milestone as the first female and deaf streamer to join FaZe Clan

MORE: FaZe Banks accused of causing $30,000 of damage after trashing hotel room

Hillary Clinton: Zuckerberg should pay price for damage to democracy – The Guardian

Mark Zuckerberg “should pay a price” for what he is doing to democracy, Hillary Clinton has said, as she expressed doubts about whether free and fair elections were even possible in the wake of Facebook’s decision to not factcheck political advertising.

Speaking in New York at a screening of The Great Hack, a Netflix documentary about the Cambridge Analytica scandal, the 2016 Democratic presidential candidate cited the threat to upcoming elections in both the US and UK as she made the damning remarks about Facebook’s decision to allow politicians to lie in adverts posted to its platform.

Her intervention comes amid speculation she may mount a third bid for the presidency.

She said it was inevitable that false information on Facebook would have an impact on elections “because propaganda works”. In 2016, she said fake news on Facebook that Pope Francis had endorsed her opponent, Donald Trump, “really did have an impact” and predicted “it’s only going to be more powerful going forward because it is more well tested. They know what they were successful at.”

She added: “And we are getting warning signals all the time about what is happening right now and how it is likely to affect our next election.”

Cambridge Analytica used illegally harvested Facebook profiles to target voters in the US election but Clinton said this was just the “tip of the iceberg” in terms of the challenges facing democracy. Nonetheless her harshest remarks were reserved for Facebook.

“When Facebook is the principal news source for more than half of the American people, and the only source of news that most of them pay any attention to, and if it announces that it has no responsibility for the airing of false ads … how are you supposed to get accurate information about anything, let alone candidates running for office?”

Mark Zuckerberg.

Mark Zuckerberg. Photograph: Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

Asked if she thought there was any connection between the closed-door meeting Zuckerberg had with Donald Trump at the White House and the subsequent decision by Facebook to change its policy around factchecking “false, deceptive or deliberately misleading content” by politicians, she said she couldn’t “draw any conclusions about closed-door meetings, not only with Trump but with Tucker Carlson [of Fox News] and with [rightwing website] Breitbart and with many others that have been going on at Facebook quarters”.

But she went on to say: “If I were of a conspiratorial mindset, I might suggest that there seems to be some connection.”

Clinton said she believed we were seeing “a war on truth” in which the “manipulation of information” served to further the interests of a set of “incredibly wealthy people who believe they can do whatever they want to do”.

She also drew attention to the connections between Brexit and the Trump campaign that she said she had not been aware of at the time. She had been “somewhat taken aback” by the Brexit result, she said, but “I didn’t, at that time, see the direct connection. I didn’t know about all the involvement of the same players in Brexit, the same players in our election.”

She said The Great Hack had been “a difficult film for me to watch” but also “so true to my own understanding of what had happened”. She said people needed to see the film because “still to this day there is a sense of disbelief about a lot of what has happened”.

The documentary, directed by Karim Amer and Jehane Noujaim, examined the use of data by Cambridge Analytica by the Trump campaign to target “persuadables” or floating voters and how the Russian government used Facebook’s platform to subvert Clinton’s campaign.

Jehane Noujaim (left) and Karim Amer (right) with The Great Hack’s producer Geralyn Dreyfous at a screening

Jehane Noujaim, left, and Karim Amer, right, with The Great Hack’s producer Geralyn Dreyfous at a screening. Photograph: AWNewYork/Rex/Shutterstock

Clinton described how, when the first reports started coming in of Russian involvement, her team had tried to raise the issue but it had been impossible to get anyone to take it seriously.

“When the Russians started dumping emails out around our convention and my campaign went out and tried to talk about that on television they were basically laughed at. It was like: ‘Oh yeah, right, now she’s going to blame the Russians.’”

She pointed out that it had been proved that the Russian government, as well as stealing emails, had also stolen her campaign’s voter data. “And then you find out that Paul Manafort is giving polling data to a Russian who has obvious ties with Russian intelligence.

“And you piece all this together and you can’t make it up. And because it’s hard to make up, it’s hard for people to believe because it’s so far out there.”

The situation only seemed to have become worse, she said. “Everyone knows it’s still going on and it will be that much harder to combat.” And she said the amount of money going into the 2020 Trump campaign combined with exhaustive testing had already put it streets ahead of her fellow Democrats.

%d bloggers like this: